Difference between revisions of "Index.php"

From Weaponized Social
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
With the latest Apple iPhones coming to India in less than 2 weeks, a lot of buyers may be wondering which iPhone 6 is right for them. This is the first time ever that Apple has launched two separate iPhone models with similar specs. At least with the iPhone 5S and 5C, one was clearly the higher end model and one was the low end device.<br><br>With the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, there are virtually no internal differences except for the battery size and the camera. So here's a few things to keep in mind when deciding which iPhone 6 you should spend your money on.<br><br>The Price difference<br><br>Apple has announced that it will launch the iPhone 6 16GB variant in India at a price of Rs. 53,500, while the 5. In case you have any kind of concerns about in which in addition to the best way to use bubble shooter pet, you'll be able to call us in our web page. 5-inch iPhone 6 Plus will start at Rs. 62,500. That is a price difference of Rs. 9,000. Going for the smaller device would mean that you spend the money you save on accessories like Bluetooth headsets or iPhone 6 cases,.<br><br>The Size difference<br><br>Both the new iPhone 6 models are incredibly thin, at around the 7mm mark. The iPhone 6 Plus is slightly thicker but not enough for anyone to notice. It is the other dimensions that are wildly different. The iPhone 6 Plus isn't just the largest iPhone ever but with a 5.5" screen it is one of the largest smartphones period. Bordering on a phablet size, the 6 Plus needs two hands to use it and Apple even gave it a one-handed mode that slide the top of the screen down so you can actually reach it. Think about where you are going to carry your phone and whether the 6 Plus will fit in your hands, your pockets or your purse.<br><br>Bendgate<br><br>Though a lot of the stories of the iPhone 6 Plus being bent are media hype, there are still legitimate stories of users who have wound up with damaged iPhones just from having them in their trouser pockets. The iPhone 6 Plus is so large and so thin that this isn't an unbelievable scenario. True, you could buy and iPhone 6 Plus cover that would provide some extra protection but there would still be that worry that you were going to ruin a device that cost more than Rs. 62,000, every time you sit down.<br><br>The Camera<br><br>One of the main selling points of iPhones have always been that they have what is probably the best smartphone camera ever. If you are one of the people who uses the iPhone camera a lot, you will want the iPhone 6 Plus with its optical stabilization features, which the iPhone 6 lacks. Even though both are great cameras, the stabilization takes the iPhone 6 Plus closer to being the only camera you will ever need. There is a trade-off though. The camera on the 6 Plus sticks out of the body in an ugly camera bulge that spoils the smooth back and makes it impossible to lay the phone down flat. The only way to resolve this is with an iPhone 6 Plus case that evens out the bump and restores a flat back to the phone.
+
Tech and business bros in a bubble. REUTERS/Albert Gea <br><br>For the last year, the tech industry has been fretting about a bubble. If you have any kind of concerns relating to where and the best ways to use bubble shooter pet, you can contact us at the web-site. <br><br>Investors on all sides argued over whether valuations were too high or whether the tech sector as a whole was still undervalued. <br><br>Yet while Silicon Valley was obsessing over the startup bubble, it collectively failed to realize it was living in a completely different kind of bubble: a political bubble. <br><br>As the reality struck late Tuesday night that Donald Trump would be the next US president, tech leaders found themselves reeling.  <br><br>Y Combinator President Sam Altman, who had compared Trump to Hitler but kept Trump-supporter Peter Thiel as a YC partner, tweeted that it felt like "the worst thing to happen in my life." <br><br>Hyperloop One cofounder and early Uber investor, Shervin Pishevar, started a plan to get California to secede from the union.  <br><br>Yes, there was a bubble in Silicon Valley — one that insulated it from the experiences and beliefs of half the nation. <br><br>A unified front?<br>Before the election, finding a Trump supporter in Silicon Valley was exceptionally rare.  <br><br>It shouldn't have been. Almost half the voters in the United States supported Trump on Tuesday. In San Francisco, one in 10 votes was cast for Trump. In Santa Clara county, home to a lot of  giant tech companies, one in five votes went to Trump. <br><br>As a Silicon Valley reporter, I personally spent over a month trying to find someone who would speak about supporting Trump. The one senior software engineer at a big tech company I did find refused to be identified publicly. He had already faced contempt and shunning after telling his teammates at work.  <br><br>Most of the time when I asked a venture capitalist or a tech CEO if they knew anyone who was for the Republican Presidential nominee, I was met with laughter or a quick dismissal: "Oh no, I don't know anyone who would support him." <br><br>Many Silicon Valley leaders tried to stop a Trump presidency, and most thought it had worked.<br><br>The push started in the early fall when more than 140 members of the tech elite signed a memo on how Trump would be a disaster for innovation. Several others, including LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Facebook cofounder Dustin Moskovitz, mobilized voting campaigns or donated millions. It seemed like a foregone conclusion Hillary Clinton would win, until it wasn't. <br><br>Silicon Valley awoke to a world that hadn't downloaded its message. <br><br>A scene from a Silicon Valley Fashion Week in 2014. Business Insider<br><br>"The biggest people in technology, media, and finance were all trying to figure out how to stop Donald Trump and he still won," Kik CEO Ted Livingston told Recode right after the results. They "have been saying to the public, ‘No, no! You don't get it!' Yesterday, the public turned around and said to them, ‘No, you don't get it.' They underestimated how much a big chunk of the country is hurting.<br><br>Inside the cozy bubble<br>Anybody who's looked closely at Silicon Valley over the last couple years should not have been surprised that a lot of its leaders are completely out of touch with reality in a lot of the country. <br><br>A startup Juicero raised $130 million and told the world it was going to solve the "produce gap" in which people don't eat enough fruits or vegetables. Its first product? A $700 wi-fi enabled juicer that looks great on a kitchen counter but does very little to help the very real problem of affordable access to fruits and vegetables, especially in food deserts.  <br><br>Then there's the litany of other "problems" Silicon Valley is solving: private chefs on-demand, a startup to take out your trash for you, or an app that connects people who are down to lunch.  <br><br>The silly ideas are easy to write down to the age-old differences between the rich and the poor, between Palo Alto and podunk USA. <br><br>But it's more than cultural dissonance.<br><br>Silicon Valley missed that people from rural towns to disenfranchised urban cores are truly hurting, in part because of an industry that they've created.  <br><br>The death of manufacturing jobs in the US is well-documented. Silicon Valley pundits tell the people who are losing jobs to technology and automation to learn new skills. Better yet, become an Uber driver or rent out your spare bedroom on Airbnb.  <br><br>Meanwhile, tech leaders are already spinning the next wave of tech-induced job loss as job creation. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said that the rise of self-driving cars and trucks will mean more jobs, as people will be needed to maintain the fleets and step in when the machines can't handle it. But that won't be enough to account for the fact that truck driver is the most common job in 29 states as of 2014, according to NPR. <br><br>the self-driving truck is all but in mass production at the moment and I just remembered this map pic.twitter.com/3oCkiyHNdn <br><br>— Findom De Siècle (@griph) November 10, 2016

Revision as of 11:18, 26 November 2017

Tech and business bros in a bubble. REUTERS/Albert Gea

For the last year, the tech industry has been fretting about a bubble. If you have any kind of concerns relating to where and the best ways to use bubble shooter pet, you can contact us at the web-site.

Investors on all sides argued over whether valuations were too high or whether the tech sector as a whole was still undervalued.

Yet while Silicon Valley was obsessing over the startup bubble, it collectively failed to realize it was living in a completely different kind of bubble: a political bubble.

As the reality struck late Tuesday night that Donald Trump would be the next US president, tech leaders found themselves reeling. 

Y Combinator President Sam Altman, who had compared Trump to Hitler but kept Trump-supporter Peter Thiel as a YC partner, tweeted that it felt like "the worst thing to happen in my life."

Hyperloop One cofounder and early Uber investor, Shervin Pishevar, started a plan to get California to secede from the union. 

Yes, there was a bubble in Silicon Valley — one that insulated it from the experiences and beliefs of half the nation.

A unified front?
Before the election, finding a Trump supporter in Silicon Valley was exceptionally rare. 

It shouldn't have been. Almost half the voters in the United States supported Trump on Tuesday. In San Francisco, one in 10 votes was cast for Trump. In Santa Clara county, home to a lot of  giant tech companies, one in five votes went to Trump.

As a Silicon Valley reporter, I personally spent over a month trying to find someone who would speak about supporting Trump. The one senior software engineer at a big tech company I did find refused to be identified publicly. He had already faced contempt and shunning after telling his teammates at work. 

Most of the time when I asked a venture capitalist or a tech CEO if they knew anyone who was for the Republican Presidential nominee, I was met with laughter or a quick dismissal: "Oh no, I don't know anyone who would support him."

Many Silicon Valley leaders tried to stop a Trump presidency, and most thought it had worked.

The push started in the early fall when more than 140 members of the tech elite signed a memo on how Trump would be a disaster for innovation. Several others, including LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Facebook cofounder Dustin Moskovitz, mobilized voting campaigns or donated millions. It seemed like a foregone conclusion Hillary Clinton would win, until it wasn't.

Silicon Valley awoke to a world that hadn't downloaded its message. 

A scene from a Silicon Valley Fashion Week in 2014. Business Insider

"The biggest people in technology, media, and finance were all trying to figure out how to stop Donald Trump and he still won," Kik CEO Ted Livingston told Recode right after the results. They "have been saying to the public, ‘No, no! You don't get it!' Yesterday, the public turned around and said to them, ‘No, you don't get it.' They underestimated how much a big chunk of the country is hurting." 

Inside the cozy bubble
Anybody who's looked closely at Silicon Valley over the last couple years should not have been surprised that a lot of its leaders are completely out of touch with reality in a lot of the country.

A startup Juicero raised $130 million and told the world it was going to solve the "produce gap" in which people don't eat enough fruits or vegetables. Its first product? A $700 wi-fi enabled juicer that looks great on a kitchen counter but does very little to help the very real problem of affordable access to fruits and vegetables, especially in food deserts. 

Then there's the litany of other "problems" Silicon Valley is solving: private chefs on-demand, a startup to take out your trash for you, or an app that connects people who are down to lunch. 

The silly ideas are easy to write down to the age-old differences between the rich and the poor, between Palo Alto and podunk USA.

But it's more than cultural dissonance.

Silicon Valley missed that people from rural towns to disenfranchised urban cores are truly hurting, in part because of an industry that they've created. 

The death of manufacturing jobs in the US is well-documented. Silicon Valley pundits tell the people who are losing jobs to technology and automation to learn new skills. Better yet, become an Uber driver or rent out your spare bedroom on Airbnb. 

Meanwhile, tech leaders are already spinning the next wave of tech-induced job loss as job creation. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said that the rise of self-driving cars and trucks will mean more jobs, as people will be needed to maintain the fleets and step in when the machines can't handle it. But that won't be enough to account for the fact that truck driver is the most common job in 29 states as of 2014, according to NPR.

the self-driving truck is all but in mass production at the moment and I just remembered this map pic.twitter.com/3oCkiyHNdn

— Findom De Siècle (@griph) November 10, 2016