Difference between revisions of "2015 May San Francisco"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added content) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 9:00 AM | Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM (PDT) | Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 9:00 AM | Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM (PDT) | ||
: Nonprofit Tech Center | : Nonprofit Tech Center | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==[http://facilitation.aspirationtech.org/index.php?title=Agenda:Hacking#Generating_the_Universe_of_Topics Universe of Topics]== | ||
| + | ===Education=== | ||
| + | * Educating "Beneficiaries | ||
| + | * how do we document success and lessons for others to learn? | ||
| + | * Getting literacy / competency distributed | ||
| + | * Educating elites/power holders | ||
| + | ===Scale Up/Out=== | ||
| + | Framework for effective change, distributing solutions | ||
| + | * Integration into "real world" systems/institutions | ||
| + | * Scope insensitivity (maybe hyperbolic discounting, too) ("my contribution doesn't matter") | ||
| + | ===Homeostasis=== | ||
| + | * Error correction (can it ''ever'' happen online? | ||
| + | * Glorifying learning in public | ||
| + | * individual rights balanced with community health | ||
| + | * Solidarity with critique | ||
| + | * "Free Speech" | ||
| + | ===(Potential) Platform)=== | ||
| + | * Prosocial UX: how the medium shapes the message | ||
| + | * Front end features | ||
| + | * back end support | ||
| + | * how do you design a social platform to discourage conflict? | ||
| + | * ethical platform/medium experimentation | ||
| + | ===Norms=== | ||
| + | * Social norms in hyper-permeable spaces (Durkheim's anoemie) | ||
| + | * Can we change social norms? | ||
| + | * How do social scripts break down on internet? | ||
| + | * How proposal traits get exploited (e.g.: first-round defectors love the norm of "always cooperate on the first turn") | ||
| + | * "listening period" for n00bs in online space | ||
| + | * Familial dynamics (parent/child, sibling/sibling) | ||
| + | * Empathy generation | ||
| + | ===Structure/Organization=== | ||
| + | * who does enforcement? | ||
| + | * Bridge figures/translators | ||
| + | * closed groups which deter racist/sexist/etc patterns | ||
| + | * Transactional analysis (Games People Play) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Discussion Topics== | ||
| + | ===[[Social Scripts|What is a social script, anyway?]]== | ||
| + | Kind of important to the whole idea of shifting them, in this discussion we covered what social scripts are to us. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===[[What is currently going wrong?]]=== | ||
| + | Using a facilitation method picked up from Tim Davies, we arced thru what we '''know''', how that makes us '''feel''', what our '''gut''' tells us, and what that means we might '''do'''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===[[Components and workarounds of dog piles]]=== | ||
| + | Individuals bringing their historical experience to bear on one example of a long-standing issue, without maintaining the sustained attention necessary to actually change the issue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===[[Detailing components of communication]]=== | ||
| + | We laid out various aspects of how communication and community occur. This will feed into how to build a pro-social platform. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Projects== | ||
| + | * [[Communication Karma Score]] : Matt suggested a way to get credit and signaling for being a good conversational partner, for using logical fallacies, etc | ||
| + | * [[IntrospectionBot]] : just like a desktop reminder to occasionally stretch or go for a walk, this would occasionally prompt a moment of self-reflection. We hope this would de-escalate | ||
| + | * [[Visualizing solidarity]] : when outrage happens online, it's often because people are dog piling on an exemplar of a historical issue, rather than using the moment of attention to direct energy towards understanding and addressing the historical issue. | ||
| + | * We discussed (and hopefully contributed to) TQ's [[Pro-Social Platform]], and associated [[Parameters of Interaction]] as related to Sands and Ethan's framework for social networks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Events]] [[Category: SFO]] | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 17 May 2015
Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 9:00 AM | Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM (PDT)
- Nonprofit Tech Center
Universe of Topics
Education
- Educating "Beneficiaries
- how do we document success and lessons for others to learn?
- Getting literacy / competency distributed
- Educating elites/power holders
Scale Up/Out
Framework for effective change, distributing solutions
- Integration into "real world" systems/institutions
- Scope insensitivity (maybe hyperbolic discounting, too) ("my contribution doesn't matter")
Homeostasis
- Error correction (can it ever happen online?
- Glorifying learning in public
- individual rights balanced with community health
- Solidarity with critique
- "Free Speech"
(Potential) Platform)
- Prosocial UX: how the medium shapes the message
- Front end features
- back end support
- how do you design a social platform to discourage conflict?
- ethical platform/medium experimentation
Norms
- Social norms in hyper-permeable spaces (Durkheim's anoemie)
- Can we change social norms?
- How do social scripts break down on internet?
- How proposal traits get exploited (e.g.: first-round defectors love the norm of "always cooperate on the first turn")
- "listening period" for n00bs in online space
- Familial dynamics (parent/child, sibling/sibling)
- Empathy generation
Structure/Organization
- who does enforcement?
- Bridge figures/translators
- closed groups which deter racist/sexist/etc patterns
- Transactional analysis (Games People Play)
Discussion Topics
=What is a social script, anyway?
Kind of important to the whole idea of shifting them, in this discussion we covered what social scripts are to us.
What is currently going wrong?
Using a facilitation method picked up from Tim Davies, we arced thru what we know, how that makes us feel, what our gut tells us, and what that means we might do.
Components and workarounds of dog piles
Individuals bringing their historical experience to bear on one example of a long-standing issue, without maintaining the sustained attention necessary to actually change the issue.
Detailing components of communication
We laid out various aspects of how communication and community occur. This will feed into how to build a pro-social platform.
Projects
- Communication Karma Score : Matt suggested a way to get credit and signaling for being a good conversational partner, for using logical fallacies, etc
- IntrospectionBot : just like a desktop reminder to occasionally stretch or go for a walk, this would occasionally prompt a moment of self-reflection. We hope this would de-escalate
- Visualizing solidarity : when outrage happens online, it's often because people are dog piling on an exemplar of a historical issue, rather than using the moment of attention to direct energy towards understanding and addressing the historical issue.
- We discussed (and hopefully contributed to) TQ's Pro-Social Platform, and associated Parameters of Interaction as related to Sands and Ethan's framework for social networks.